|
|
Post by DIRTYMIKE on Sept 7, 2004 17:17:08 GMT
i think us reviewers should start a union to protect us from corporate disruption. for example, if sharpie demanded 5 reviews in one week from all of us and we could only do 3 and he fired us that would be unfair, but if we start a union and nominate a union chairperson, we can hold a conference once a month with mr Sharp to discuss matters.
|
|
|
|
Post by Druscilla on Sept 7, 2004 19:20:01 GMT
thats very posh
|
|
|
|
Post by DIRTYMIKE on Sept 8, 2004 6:38:24 GMT
its also the correct way.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sharpie on Sept 8, 2004 12:38:21 GMT
WHAAAAAAAAT?
FIRED!
|
|
|
|
Post by EditorOllie on Sept 8, 2004 14:57:18 GMT
If I was told to submit 5 reviews a week, I would kill the boy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sharpie on Sept 8, 2004 17:48:06 GMT
It won't happen. I'm too lazy to add them all  |
|
|
|
Post by EditorOllie on Sept 9, 2004 11:29:50 GMT
That's why you've hired Maaarsh to help you.
You filthy wench.
|
|
|
|
Post by DIRTYMIKE on Sept 16, 2004 16:58:18 GMT
who's marsh?
|
|
|
|
Post by Sharpie on Sept 16, 2004 17:45:21 GMT
NO, not maaarsh, the OTHER adam. Heffer.  |
|
|
|
Post by DIRTYMIKE on Sept 17, 2004 6:45:55 GMT
who's a heffer?
|
|
|
|
Post by Sharpie on Sept 17, 2004 14:41:30 GMT
Him and Ollie do like 90% of the reviews.
|
|
|
|
Post by DIRTYMIKE on Sept 18, 2004 14:48:27 GMT
i would do more reviews, but im crap with big words, and words in general..............
|
|
|
|
Post by Sharpie on Sept 19, 2004 19:47:20 GMT
Call the nme |
|
|
|
Post by DIRTYMIKE on Sept 19, 2004 20:16:03 GMT
i already have, they rejected me coz they thot i knew too much about how they work. i know what their game is.
they take a band and compare it to a band from the 60's through to the 80's then call them the new "clash" for example that way everyone thinks COOL a new clash, coz if the old clash werent good enough for ya heres a new and improved.....what bollocks.
whats wrong with the music industry these days is there isnt enough progression, artists are trying to recreate a sound that was made twenty odd years ago instead of making a brand new sound that no-ones heard. thats what makes me ollie and craig cool coz we understand that, and im sure a few others on this board do too. the nme and kerrang and even MTV2 (even though they sometimes play the odd great tune but only on 120 minutes) do the same bands suck for example razorlight dubbed "the new bob dylan"
keane......just pure shite
the ordinary boys "the new smiths/clash/cure
why not try and make a sound of their own, ok their music may be distinctive but its not original. originality and progression is what keeps music alive and its all these little bands like pandemonium epideme up to bands that have been on the go for years like the fall, wire, and many many others, ok they may old but they continue to write the finest music and they progress their sound, they arent like the old crustys like sham 69 or the damned who have been playing the same set since 1979. this is my rant and i hope you all understand and agree with me, i also hope you realise i managed to produce this without the use of any big or complicated words. thankyou
i have been DIRTYMIKE and you have been a great audience.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sharpie on Sept 19, 2004 20:39:32 GMT
I understand. My rant on the old feed-back site wasn't as good as this one ^
|
|
